Cutting Comparison Chart

Comparing Features of Different Cutting Methods

Get Your Custom Solution

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Email*
Phone Number*
Comments
Accepted file types: pdf, dwg, dxf, stp, step, Max. file size: 50 MB.

With most conventional cutting methods, they might offer a unique advantage but still fail to meet all of your cutting needs. The Microwaterjet® process provides invaluable cutting benefits and results that you can trust. Explore the chart below to compare conventional cutting methods to each other and see how the Microwaterjet® continues to excel.

Cutting Features

Microwaterjet Cutting

Waterjet Cutting

Laser Cutting

Wire EDM Cutting

Chemical Etching

Able to cut a wide range of materials, from rubber to hard alloys

green checkmark
green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
red x

Fast prototype capabilities

green checkmark
green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
red x

No thermal impact or heat affected zones

green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
red x
green checkmark

Can cut within a geometric tolerance of +/-0.01mm

green checkmark
red x
green checkmark
green checkmark
green checkmark

No post processing required

green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
red x
green checkmark

No change in material structure

green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
red x
green checkmark

High cutting speed

green checkmark
green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
red x

High surface quality

green checkmark
red x
red x
green checkmark
green checkmark

Can cut a kerf width as narrow as 0.2mm

green checkmark
red x
green checkmark
red x
red x

Minimal burr on the cutting edge

green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
green checkmark
green checkmark

Just-in-time fabrication

green checkmark
green checkmark
green checkmark
red x
red x

Ready to try a cutting technique with no post-processing or heat-affected zones? Fill out the form below so we can learn more about your project!